Compare models on your own examples.
Run the same examples through each candidate. Read the failed answers before you choose.
Explore evaluationModels you compare, answers your application returns, steps your agents take, and the AI tools your people use all follow the same examples, rules, and skills.
The inbox flags comparisons where the results are too close to separate the candidates. More examples can help you decide.
3 items need you.
Support ticket routing. 3.9 points on 180 examples, 95% CI 82.1 to 92.2 against 77.8 to 88.9 for live. More examples would separate them.
Keep your task’s examples and rules connected to the release your application uses.
Run the same examples through each candidate. Read the failed answers before you choose.
Explore evaluationLet an agent look things up. Have a person approve the actions that need judgment.
Explore agent permissionsReview the request, response, and release together when an answer fails a rule.
Explore productionA live answer can reveal a case your examples missed. Review the correction before adding it to the task’s dataset.
A reviewer catches an outage that the model treated as a routine question.
The example records the correct priority and whether a person should handle the ticket.
Run each candidate against the reviewed ticket to check whether it makes the same mistake.
Explore a support answer with a missing field and inspect the warning Orlo returns with it.
See Orlo at workOrlo is evals, evidence, and release guardrails for production AI, made by fineSample. Teams use it to compare AI models on their own examples with confidence intervals, release the winner as a frozen version, check every live answer against their rules, decide what each agent step may do, and keep a record of what ran. It runs as a hosted service or on a team’s own infrastructure and calls the models a team chooses rather than hosting any. Orlo is not a model host, an agent framework, or a compliance system. Documentation is at docs.useorlo.com.